Expensive models and experiments
PIML can reduce repeated simulation or experimental cost while retaining the governing knowledge used in Chemical Engineering.
Physics-Informed Machine Learning Society
FDP: 25 September 2026
Annual Meeting: 08–09 July 2027
Andhra Pradesh, India
pimlsociety@gmail.com
Chemical Engineering is one of the most naturally suited disciplines for Physics-Informed Machine Learning (PIML) because chemical-engineering systems are already described by a rich foundation of physical laws, conservation equations, thermodynamics, transport phenomena, reaction kinetics and process dynamics.
conservation of mass; * conservation of momentum; * conservation of energy; * heat transfer; * mass transfer; * fluid mechanics; * chemical reaction kinetics; * thermodynamics; * phase equilibria; * reactor design equations; * population balances; * adsorption and separation models; * process-control equations; and * coupled multiphysics models.
This page presents ten focused research areas, degree-level project pathways, selected publications and direct support through the PIMLS biweekly members meeting.
This Chemical Engineering guide covers Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), physics-guided machine learning, scientific machine learning, neural operators, hybrid models and engineering digital twins. Explore the research and project pathways below, then join the Physics-Informed Machine Learning Society to connect with the international PIMLS community.
Use available scientific knowledge to make limited data more useful, transparent and testable.
PIML can reduce repeated simulation or experimental cost while retaining the governing knowledge used in Chemical Engineering.
Learn uncertain parameters, closures or discrepancies around an inspectable mechanistic foundation.
Test whether structured models generalize across geometries, materials, assets, operating regimes or sites.
Use physical residuals, independent measurements, uncertainty and conventional engineering baselines before deployment.
Each card connects a meaningful Chemical Engineering question with suitable scientific knowledge, modelling choices and evidence needed to test it.
Chemical reaction engineering is one of the most promising areas for Physics-Informed Machine Learning. Chemical reactors are governed by: Reaction Kinetics Mass Transfer Heat Transfer Fluid Flow Thermodynamics Potential PIML applications include: PIML becomes particularly useful when the complete reaction…
Catalysis provides an especially interesting research opportunity because catalytic systems frequently involve complex interactions among: Reaction Kinetics Surface Chemistry Adsorption Mass Transfer Heat Transfer Fluid Dynamics A catalytic reactor may contain hundreds of possible chemical reactions and…
Transport phenomena forms the theoretical backbone of Chemical Engineering. It includes:
Chemical engineers frequently use Computational Fluid Dynamics for: Reactors Mixers Pipelines Cyclones Fluidized Beds Separators Combustion Systems Multiphase Systems High-fidelity CFD simulations can become computationally expensive, particularly for: Physics-Informed Machine Learning can potentially create…
Process Systems Engineering is particularly well aligned with machine learning. It encompasses: Process Modelling Simulation Optimization Control Design Operations Planning A 2025 review of AI and machine learning across Process Systems Engineering discusses their use across scales ranging from molecules and…
Chemical Engineering already has a long tradition of mechanistic modelling. Instead of discarding these models, researchers can combine them with machine learning. This is commonly referred to as: Hybrid Modelling Science-Guided Machine Learning Physics-Guided Machine Learning Grey-Box Modelling…
Chemical-process control is another important PIML application. Chemical processes are dynamic. Variables such as: Temperature Pressure Composition Level Flow Rate change continuously. PIML can potentially support: A 2026 chemical-engineering perspective identifies real-time dynamics and control as one of…
Many important process variables cannot be measured continuously. For example: Product Composition Reaction Conversion Internal Reactor Concentration Catalyst Activity Particle Properties Internal Temperature Fields A soft sensor estimates such variables from other measurements. Traditional soft sensors are…
Separation processes consume a significant fraction of energy in the chemical industry. Potential PIML applications include: Distillation Absorption Adsorption Extraction Membrane Separation Chromatography Drying Crystallization Filtration Possible research questions include: ---
Distillation combines: Vapour-Liquid Equilibrium Mass Transfer Energy Transfer Hydraulics These relationships provide strong physical constraints. A PIML model could combine: Tray/packing measurements + thermodynamic models + mass and energy balances to predict: Product Purity Column Temperature Profile…
Start with a scope that matches your time, mathematical background, experimental access and expected research contribution.
Learn the foundations with a bounded, measurable system.
A reproducible implementation, clear baselines, a manageable dataset and physically meaningful validation.
Combine an engineering model, substantial data and rigorous comparison.
A thesis-quality study with held-out regimes, mechanistic and data-only baselines, ablation and uncertainty.
Address a publishable methodological, multiscale or deployment research gap.
New methodology or validated engineering insight, multi-regime evidence, reproducible software and journal publications.
Choose one Chemical Engineering question and a measurable engineering output.
State the governing relationships, constraints or validated domain knowledge you will retain.
Build mechanistic and data-only baselines before the hybrid model.
Hold out experiments, conditions, assets, sites or regimes at the deployment level.
Report uncertainty, ablation, limitations, data lineage and reproducible code.
Use this focused reading list to understand the general PIML framework, direct Chemical Engineering evidence and suitable hybrid modelling methods.
Do not list papers only. Compare the engineering question, incorporated knowledge, data, split strategy, baselines, uncertainty and evidence level.
This source is included in the Chemical Engineering literature guide because it demonstrates or reviews a relevant physics-informed, hybrid, inverse, surrogate or scientific-machine-learning approach. Read the methods, data split, baselines and validation evidence—not only the reported accuracy.
This source is included in the Chemical Engineering literature guide because it demonstrates or reviews a relevant physics-informed, hybrid, inverse, surrogate or scientific-machine-learning approach. Read the methods, data split, baselines and validation evidence—not only the reported accuracy.
This source is included in the Chemical Engineering literature guide because it demonstrates or reviews a relevant physics-informed, hybrid, inverse, surrogate or scientific-machine-learning approach. Read the methods, data split, baselines and validation evidence—not only the reported accuracy.
This source is included in the Chemical Engineering literature guide because it demonstrates or reviews a relevant physics-informed, hybrid, inverse, surrogate or scientific-machine-learning approach. Read the methods, data split, baselines and validation evidence—not only the reported accuracy.
This source is included in the Chemical Engineering literature guide because it demonstrates or reviews a relevant physics-informed, hybrid, inverse, surrogate or scientific-machine-learning approach. Read the methods, data split, baselines and validation evidence—not only the reported accuracy.
This source is included in the Chemical Engineering literature guide because it demonstrates or reviews a relevant physics-informed, hybrid, inverse, surrogate or scientific-machine-learning approach. Read the methods, data split, baselines and validation evidence—not only the reported accuracy.
Scientific ML, optimization, software and scalable computation.
CFD, thermal systems, equipment and multiphysics.
Bioprocesses, pharmaceuticals and biological reaction systems.
Instrumentation, process control, electrochemistry and energy systems.
These answers help students avoid common scope, terminology and validation mistakes.
Use the biweekly meeting form for research guidance.
Request accessNo. Chemical Engineering projects may use physics-guided features, hybrid residual models, differentiable simulators, neural operators, constrained architectures or data assimilation. State exactly what knowledge is incorporated.
Choose one engineering question, a measurable output and a defensible mechanistic baseline. Add learning only where data can identify an uncertainty or discrepancy.
A meaningful question, justified prior knowledge, deployment-level holdouts, strong baselines, ablation, uncertainty, reproducibility and honest limitations.
Simulation can broaden coverage, but simulation-only evidence cannot establish real-system accuracy. Use calibrated experiments, field measurements or trusted independent references appropriate to the claim.
Submit the biweekly members meeting form to discuss your project level, branch, data, model, validation plan and possible collaborators.
Join the biweekly members meeting for project guidance, collaboration and publication planning—or contact the Society directly.
Meeting participation is requested through the Google form. Complete it carefully so the Society can understand your research interest.